CORAL: Collaborative Online Research And Learning
 

Evaluation Rubric


Collaborative AnalysisIV Rubric

 

Category

4
Accomplished
3
Developing

2
Beginning

1
Does not meet
Writing & Language
Well formed ideas explicated using clear writing and proper grammar. Concise and logical writing.
Good writing and minimal grammatical errors.
Numerous grammatical errors, poor flow, writing needs improvement.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Formatting & Readings
The paper is written in APA format without error. All citations are both in text and in the works cited.
There are minimal APA formatting errors.
There are numerous APA formatting errors
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Relevant Readings:
The paper deomonstrates that all members read the assigned readings and integrated those ideas into the paper (must be cited).
The paper cites all sources; however, they were not integrated into the writing.
Minimal outside references. Limited and poor citations.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Collaborative Team Effectiveness:

Described relevant team effectiveness processes from the first 3 Collaborative Analysis.

Included examples of team effectiveness processes from team.

Described to some degree relevant team effectiveness processes from the first 3 Collaborative Analysis.
Described minimally relevant team effectiveness processes from the first 3 Collaborative Analysis.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Effectiveness:

Did you incorporate team norms and roles?

Explain how they changed from week one to week fifteen!

Some norms were addressed but early norms were missing.
There were numerous norms missing, and or the writing was minimal or poor.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Effectiveness:

Addressed dysfunctions 4 & 5. [Accountability & Results]

Explained [without defining] your team’s accountability policy.

Provided detail as to how the policy changed throughout the semester.

Dysfunctions were addressed well, yet one or two were missing.
Minimal dysfunctions were addressed and or the writing was minimal or poor.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Effectiveness:

Discussed how Result oriented teams establish their own measurements for success.

Explained how your team measured success.

Apart from PG feedback.

Most topics were addressed well, one or two were missing.
There were numerous topics missing, and or the writing was minimal or poor.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Effectiveness:

Addressed Dysfunction #2, Overcoming Fear of Conflict?


Explained [without defining] your teams constructive vs. destructive conflict.

Give example from your team.
Most topics were addressed well, one or two were missing.
There were numerous topics missing, and or the writing was minimal or poor.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Evolution

Applied Tuckman’s stages to your team for the whole semester?

Listed examples of developmental stages from team experiences for the entire semester?

Used examples from your team

The readings were clearly done and applied to the evolution of the team.

However, the writing should be improved or there were sections that need elaboration.

The writing is poor.


The stages were only minimally developed

Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Evolution - WTW Data
Presented, illustrated & explained who-to-whom data.
WTW data reported with some explanation of data.
Some data reported but mimimal discussion of data.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Barriers & Solutions

Described the problems that the team encountered.

What were the most significant challenges and the most helpful solutions?

What lessons have you learned?

Problems, plan, and process were discussed fairly well.
Poor analysis of problems and lack of problem solving process.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Barriers & Solutions

Describe how team addressed problems & resolutions over the 15 weeks.

Used a table format.

Problems & resolutions listed with some plan to reslove.
Problems listed with an incomplete plan to reslove.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Collaboration, Flow and Integration:

Accomplished.

Collaboration, written in one voice and good integration of ideas.

Integrated Collaborative Analyses I, II & III

Developing

There is a degree of collaboration with some cooperative issues regarding integration of ideas and overall flow.

Mediocre Integration of Collaborative Analyses I, II & III

Beginning

Team demonstrates an understanding of collaborative versus cooperative concepts.

Minimal Integration of Collaborative Analyses I, II & III

Does not meet minimum requirements.