CORAL: Collaborative Online Research And Learning
 

Evaluation Rubric


Collaborative Analysis III Rubric

 

Category

4
Accomplished
3
Developing

2
Beginning

1
Does not meet
Writing & Language
Well formed ideas explicated using clear writing and proper grammar. Concise and logical writing.
Good writing and minimal grammatical errors.
Numerous grammatical errors, poor flow, writing needs improvement.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Formatting & Readings
The paper is written in APA format without error. All citations are both in text and in the works cited.
There are minimal APA formatting errors.
There are numerous APA formatting errors
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Relevant Readings:
The paper deomonstrates that all members read the assigned readings and integrated those ideas into the paper (must be cited).
The paper cites all sources; however, they were not integrated into the writing.
Minimal outside references. Limited and poor citations.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Effectiveness:

Described & discussed the contact hypothesis and its it affect on the team.

Used examples from your team.

Contact hypothesis addressed but minimally applied to team..

Contact hypothesis minimally addressed and not applied to team..

 

Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Effectiveness:

Discussed the outgroup homogeneity bias.

Discussed how it was resolved/reduced?

Outgroup homogeity Bias addressed but minimally applied to team..
Outgroup homogeity Bias minimally addressed but not applied to team.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Effectiveness:

Defined superordinate goal?


Described team’s superordinate goal?


Described how superordinate goals affect team functioning?


Discussed how team’s superordinate goal has been met?

Discussed how it affects team progress?

Superordinate goal addressed but minimally applied to team..
Superordinate goal addressed but not applied to team...
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Effectiveness:

Define and identifed team norms?

Gave examples of norms from your team?

Defined Team roles?

Gave examples of roles from your team?

Team norms were addressed and minimally applied to team..
Team norms were addressed but not applied to team...
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Effectiveness:
Addressed dysfunction # 3 Achieving Committment?

Explained [without defining] your teams Committment vs Consensus.

Gave example(s) from your team.

Dysfunction # 3 Achieving Committment addressed and minimally applied to team..
Dysfunction # 3 Achieving Committment addressed but not applied to team.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Evolution
Identified the Tuckman stage your team is currently in.

Explained how this stage is specific to your team.

Used example(s) from your team.

The readings were clearly done and applied to the evolution of the team. However, the writing should be improved or there were sections that need elaboration.
The writing is poor.
The stages were only minimally developed
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Evolution - WTW Data
Presented, illustrated & explained who-to-whom data.
WTW data reported with some explanation of data.
Some data reported but mimimal discussion of data.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Barriers & Solutions
Described the problems that the team encountered.
Problems, plan, and process were discussed fairly well.
Poor analysis of problems and lack of problem solving process.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Barriers & Solutions

Describe how team plans to solve these problems.

Used a table format.

Problems listed with some plan to reslove.
Problems listed with an incomplete plan to reslove.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Collaborative vs.. Cooperative Work:

Accomplished:

Paper was written in one voice, demonstrates all participants equal understanding of material, collaborative work is apparent in VCs and group interaction up to the paper

Developing:

Paper and group interaction are moderately collaborative and indicate progress towards collaborative processes.

Beginning:

Team demonstrates an understanding of collaborative versus cooperative concepts.

Intergration is limited

Does not meet minimum requirements.

Team interaction/ process and paper are both cooperative in nature.