CORAL: Collaborative Online Research And Learning
 

Evaluation Rubric


Applied Mental Health Literaure Rubric

 

Category
4
3
2
1
Style: Organization:
Well formed ideas explicated using clear writing and proper grammar. Concise and logical writing.
Good writing and minimal grammatical errors.
Numerous grammatical errors, poor flow, writing needs improvement.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Style: Writing & Language:
Well formed ideas explicated using clear writing and proper grammar. Concise and logical writing.
Good writing and minimal grammatical errors.
Numerous grammatical errors, poor flow, writing needs improvement.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Style: Collaboration, Flow and Integration::

Excellent collaboration, written in one voice and seemless integration of ideas - No Revisions are necessary.

Proficient degree of collaboration with some issues regarding integration of ideas and overall flow. Minor revisions are recommended.
Fair degree of collaboration with some significant issues regarding integration of ideas and overall flow. Significant revisions are necessary.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Style: Formatting:

The paper is written in APA format without error. All citations are both in text and in the works cited.

 

There are minimal APA formatting errors.
There are numerous APA formatting errors.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Content: Introduction

Provided description of topic, identified focus questions, provided an empirically based rationale for their topic.

Most items were addressed well, one or two were missing.
There were numerous items missing, and or the writing was minimal or poor.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Content: Literature Review - Scope of Problem

Provided comprehensive data driven description of the depth and breadth of problem.

Most items were addressed well, one or two were missing.
There were numerous items missing, and or the writing was minimal or poor.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Content: Literature Review - Root Cause Analysis
Provided theoretical discussion of the major factors that are causing the underlying issue explored in the paper.

Most topics were addressed well, one or two were missing.
There were numerous topics missing, and or the writing was minimal or poor.
Does not meet minimum requirements.
Content: Literature Review - Best Practices
Provided a review of how organizations are coping with this issue in the field. This is a review of successful methods that have been employed elsewhere.

Most topics were addressed well, one or two were missing.
There were numerous topics missing, and or the writing was minimal or poor.
Does not meet minimum requirements.